Control of Kelp
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:07 pm
So I was gonna get my kayak out there and a machete to remove some of the kelp at the best wave/gybe spot at Klover. I figure puncturing the "float" this would take care of things.....not sure after reading this:
"The direct impact on the forests is considered minimal because the canopy is often replaced rapidly by the growth of fronds from the base of the plants. Moreover, the alga is perennial and the reproductive portions of the algae are located at the base of the plant and remain intact during and subsequent to the removal of the canopy. Thus, the algae are able to reproduce and forests persist in the face of large-scale mechanical extraction.
The extraction of bull kelp is problematic. Extraction is primarily by hand from a boat and, like giant kelp, limited to the upper 2 m of the forest. However, the source of buoyancy that keeps the alga upright, and the reproductive organs of bull kelp, are located at the top of the alga and are thereby removed when the upper portion of the alga is cut off. Although bull kelp is an annual, with life spans generally limited to one year, individual plants must reproduce prior to death for forests to persist from one generation to the next. Removal of the upper portion of the plant prior to reproduction can potentially preclude the production of subsequent generations. Because the spores of bull kelp are thought to move very short distances (10’s of meters), local impairment of reproduction might terminate the persistence of a forest."
At the risk of being labeled an eco terrorist, any thoughts anyone? I am just talking about removing a few square meters here off the reef.....
"The direct impact on the forests is considered minimal because the canopy is often replaced rapidly by the growth of fronds from the base of the plants. Moreover, the alga is perennial and the reproductive portions of the algae are located at the base of the plant and remain intact during and subsequent to the removal of the canopy. Thus, the algae are able to reproduce and forests persist in the face of large-scale mechanical extraction.
The extraction of bull kelp is problematic. Extraction is primarily by hand from a boat and, like giant kelp, limited to the upper 2 m of the forest. However, the source of buoyancy that keeps the alga upright, and the reproductive organs of bull kelp, are located at the top of the alga and are thereby removed when the upper portion of the alga is cut off. Although bull kelp is an annual, with life spans generally limited to one year, individual plants must reproduce prior to death for forests to persist from one generation to the next. Removal of the upper portion of the plant prior to reproduction can potentially preclude the production of subsequent generations. Because the spores of bull kelp are thought to move very short distances (10’s of meters), local impairment of reproduction might terminate the persistence of a forest."
At the risk of being labeled an eco terrorist, any thoughts anyone? I am just talking about removing a few square meters here off the reef.....