Long Beach gear

General discussions about windsurfing: equipment, setup tips, problems, where to go, where you should have been, lost and found
Post Reply
GWIND
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:30 pm

Long Beach gear

Post by GWIND »

That long beach is hard on gear
Attachments
IMG_3325.JPG
IMG_3325.JPG (753.67 KiB) Viewed 2774 times
Thinking is over rated- Homer Simpson
Back to Top
User avatar
winddude
Posts: 497
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Dude, it's windy

Post by winddude »

or chinook is using less than the best aluminum...
Attachments
18813198_10154388592297587_2070906314362980453_n.jpg
18813198_10154388592297587_2070906314362980453_n.jpg (69.57 KiB) Viewed 2753 times
Must ... Sail... More...
Lawrence <a href="http://www.winddude.com">'Wind Dude'</a> Stewart
Back to Top
User avatar
C36
Website Donor
Website Donor
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Burnaby, BC
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by C36 »

Sorry to see the damage.

On the bright side if the base was carbon it likely would have broken resulting in rig/board separation (and potentially more sail/mast damage in the shore break) and better the tail broke as it is cheaper to replace than the arms.
Back to Top
User avatar
winddoctor
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Near Kook st.
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Post by winddoctor »

C36 wrote:Sorry to see the damage.

On the bright side if the base was carbon it likely would have broken resulting in rig/board separation (and potentially more sail/mast damage in the shore break) and better the tail broke as it is cheaper to replace than the arms.
I wonder if carbon bases, especially longer ones, flex enough that they don't bend/kink/snap like aluminum ones. Aluminum booms are brutal for breakage. Carbon is the way (initial $$$$$ hit but over long run possibly cheaper).
Poultry in motion
Back to Top
User avatar
TheLaw
Posts: 692
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:54 am
Location: Cowichan Valley, BC

Post by TheLaw »

spoken like a true kiter Chris! I see through what you wrote there...admit it you hate windsurfers. :D
Give'R
Back to Top
User avatar
winddoctor
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Near Kook st.
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Post by winddoctor »

:P
Poultry in motion
Back to Top
User avatar
C36
Website Donor
Website Donor
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Burnaby, BC
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by C36 »

C36 wrote:Sorry to see the damage.

On the bright side if the base was carbon it likely would have broken resulting in rig/board separation (and potentially more sail/mast damage in the shore break) and better the tail broke as it is cheaper to replace than the arms.
winddoctor wrote:I wonder if carbon bases, especially longer ones, flex enough that they don't bend/kink/snap like aluminum ones. Aluminum booms are brutal for breakage. Carbon is the way (initial $$$$$ hit but over long run possibly cheaper).
I thought the same thing, until I saw three extensions crushed in the waves, all carbon. I have seen aluminum extensions bend (like Gwind's, but haven't seen any break). As for carbon booms - Ben did two last summer and Chris Klohn warranted three from memory (big guy snapped them doing forwards).

edit: Heard that Chinook warranted the boom. Hope that happened.
Back to Top
Post Reply

Return to “Windsurfing Discussion”